...

A castrato (Italian, plural: castrati) is a man with a singing voice equivalent to that of a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or contralto voice produced either by castration of the singer before puberty or one who, because of an endocrinological condition, never reaches sexual maturity.

Castration before puberty (or in its early stages) prevents a boy’s larynx from being transformed by the normal physiological events of puberty. As a result, the vocal range of prepubescence (shared by both sexes) is largely retained, and the voice develops into adulthood in a unique way. Prepubescent castration for this purpose diminished greatly in the late 18th century and was made illegal in Italy in 1870.

As the castrato’s body grew, his lack of testosterone meant that his epiphyses (bone-joints) did not harden in the normal manner. Thus the limbs of the castrati often grew unusually long, as did the bones of their ribs. This, combined with intensive training, gave them unrivalled lung-power and breath capacity. Operating through small, child-sized vocal cords, their voices were also extraordinarily flexible, and quite different from the equivalent adult female voice, as well as higher vocal ranges of the uncastrated adult male (see soprano, mezzo-soprano, alto, sopranist, countertenor and contralto). Listening to the only surviving recordings of a castrato (see above), one can hear that the lower part of the voice sounds like a “super-high” tenor, with a more falsetto-like upper register above that.

Castrati were rarely referred to as such: in the 18th century, the euphemism musico (pl musici) was much more generally used, although it usually carried derogatory implications; another synonym was evirato (literally meaning “emasculated”). Eunuch is a more general term, since historically many eunuchs were castrated after puberty, castration thus having no effect on their voices.

The “proletarian dictatorships” of the early 20th century were inextricably intertwined with a bourgeois program of accumulation, modernization and development within the context of the commodity economy.

An entanglement which was further imposed in both Barcelona and Petrograd by entrapment within the conventional military fronts of imperialist wars.

The proletarian dictatorship to come is the destruction of the commodity economy, reduction in the rate of accumulation, free distribution of consumer necessities and drastic reduction in the volume of industrial production and in the consumption of energy.

Its only hope is to be found in a globalized massification of low intensity conflict-not in the illusory hope of victory in the rigged game of conventional war (even more absurd now then it was then).

Concretely we need:

1: Cadre organizations developing a collective process of militant practice and theoretical development towards the formation of the Party-not a sect but the real nucleus and center of gravity of the revolutionary process. Which generate and engender a collective will to sacrifice and struggle while constituting a war machine capable of leading the assault upon the imperialist state.

2: Intermediate mass organizations which act to defend the specific material interests of the exploited on every front-against police, bosses, landlords, and prison bureaucrats while propagating a new culture, new norms of conduct and new means of resolving contradictions and disputes among the masses-outside the bosses law. Which form the skeleton of the mass organizations to form the substance of the new state.

3: Structures of defense and intervention which develop the capacity for unrestrained struggle against the enemy through practice-which constitute the instruments of proletarian military policy and develop the nucleus of the future Red Army.

Social revolution is not existentialism but a concrete material project

http://signalfire.org/?p=14806

The construction of the proletariat as a truly unified political subject able to successfully carry out the transition to communism entails as its precondition the liquidation of men as a social class.

http://www.politicsisnotabanana.com/2011/09/these-colors-still-dont-know-how-to-run.html

Therefore, the tactical departure (or resuscitation) that we attempted was, rather than an internal development of the anarchist milieu, a selective reactivation of possibilities in adaptation to the times. A new iteration of capitalist sociability made a certain theoretical hypothesis realistic, and so we took the torch held out to us. Held out to us by terrorism. We were not the only vector of this historical transmission, but we were one of them. The result, which we witness in London as much as Athens, is a diffuse pornographic intelligence: Osama Spontex.[2]

Our own experiments eventually ran aground on the difficulties of sustaining a project that expresses itself only as emptiness. The secret thread of revolutionary commitment running from event to event did not matter at the level of our social reproduction or our material support base, for the simple reason that it was secret. We dispersed in various directions. Some formed communes, some got serious about Marx, some returned to building the anarchist movement. In every case, we took a step back from the extreme hypothesis. Without abandoning the insurrectionary strategy of rupture, we reinscribed rupture within a logic of continuity.


2 Mao Spontex denotes the attempt in post-68 France to elaborate the theory of revolutionary guerrilla warfare without reference to a centralized party-apparatus. Its intellectual expression is exemplified by writers like Deleuze, Foucault, and Guattari. Practically, it is supposed to have influenced (and learned from) the Italian Autonomia. The ideas seem to have affinity with the Invisible Committee’s idea of the Party, which (incidentally) also references anomic violence in the terrorist manner.

what is to grub…

“Frequently it seems that the world spirit has forgotten and lost itself. But inside it resists. Internally it continues to labour — as Hamlet said of his father’s ghost: ‘Well said, old mole! canst work i’ the ground so fast?’ — until it gathers strength, and breaks through the earth’s crust separating it from its sun, from its reason. And then the world spirit forges ahead rejuvenated with giant strides.”

[Hegel, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Volume 3, p 685.]

“But the revolution is thoroughgoing. It is still traveling through purgatory. It does its work methodically. By December 2, 1851, it had completed half of its preparatory work; now it is completing the other half. It first completed the parliamentary power in order to be able to overthrow it. Now that it has achieved this, it completes the executive power, reduces it to its purest expression, isolates it, sets it up against itself as the sole target, in order to concentrate all its forces of destruction against it. And when it has accomplished this second half of its preliminary work, Europe will leap from its seat and exult: Well burrowed, old mole!”

[Marx, chapter 7, Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte]

“In the signs that bewilder the middle class, the aristocracy and the poor prophets of regression, we do recognise our brave friend, Robin Goodfellow, the old mole that can work in the earth so fast, that worthy pioneer — the Revolution. The English working men are the firstborn sons of modern industry. They will then, certainly, not be the last in aiding the social revolution produced by that industry, a revolution, which means the emancipation of their own class all over the world, which is as universal as capital-rule and wages-slavery. I know the heroic struggles the English working class have gone through since the middle of the last century — struggles less glorious, because they are shrouded in obscurity, and burked by the middleclass historian. To revenge the misdeeds of the ruling class, there existed in the middle ages, in Germany, a secret tribunal, called the “Vehmgericht.” [1] If a red cross was seen marked on a house, people knew that its owner was doomed by the “Vehm.” All the houses of Europe are now marked with the mysterious red cross.

History is the judge — its executioner, the proletarian.”

[1.] The Vehmgericht, derived from Vehme (judgment, punishment) and Gericht (court), was a secret tribunal which exercised great power in Westphalia from the end of the twelfth to the middle of the sixteenth century.

[Marx, Toast to the Proletarians of Europe]

”- so 6.5 foot Nietzsche head done in stolen electrical.”
-From an old friend, just relocated to Chicago

”- so 6.5 foot Nietzsche head done in stolen electrical.”

-From an old friend, just relocated to Chicago

There is a philosophical term in Hegel for thinking in finite
categories. He calls it Understanding. When you recognize that
the categories of thought are not finite but move, and when you
know how and why they move, then your method is the method
of Reason. Don’t think you know that categories move. You
don’t. You just don’t until you know how and why. You must
be patient and humble. Hegel says it a thousand times. All error,
in thought and action, comes from this. All error. All. He is right,
so we will, if you please, look and stop and look again and in
and out and in and out and round and about, constantly setting
off in different directions from the same spot.

-Notes on Dialectics, CLR James